Those of you that use Google Webmaster Tools, good news! They are now graphing top search queries, revealing clickthrough ratios.

webmastertools

Looking at my old road rage site, MonkeyMeter.com, I found my best keyword was really “road terms”, and not road rage, though I get more hits for road rage type searches. When Google users search road terms, 7 out of 10 of them will visit my site. That’s a number I like to see. Continue reading »

 

I was studying one of my clients analytics today, and was please to see a such a low bounce on their Google traffic. They currently get about 2,000 visitors a month from Google with a bounce rate of just 23%. It appears I nailed it for this site in regards in targeting keywords. The reality is though, all I nailed was their name.

They Kind of Remember You

Doing a little more digging around, I did find that I ranked well for several of the keywords I was after. What really amazed me, and I simply had to take the time to count them all, was the number of ways people searched for this company. I guess most people just kind of remember who you are, or at least your company. I counted 274 different ways people searched for my clients site by company name in just one month, and that was just from Google. The company’s name was made of three words, and also includes an Inc. afterwards. Here is a list of the different ways I found people searching for my clients site by company name. Continue reading »

 

Three weeks ago I took a leap of faith, and moved by search box from a location that would be perceived by most as the best place to have it. It was in the header on the right. Highly visible, on every page, and was very much in it’s own zone. Usability wise, it appeared to be a win. Apparently though, that was far from the truth.

Picking the Location

When the search box was in it’s old location it acted as a dedicated fail safe method for visitors to find my content. My main menu, running horizontal in the header, lead to the search box, so it appeared to be a logical placement. Can’t find what you are looking for using the menu? Try searching. Continue reading »

 

Well here is a big whoops I did today messing up every PC on my network. I went to my Google Toolbar, typed in “<title>Home</title>”, and hit enter. I was then quickly punished by Google for making such a search. They don’t like me searching meta tags apparently. If you would like to test it yourself, I would simply suggest, DON’T! I’m still waiting for things to return back to normal. Continue reading »

 

Working on increasing my average page views per visitor this month I decided to take a look back on how things are going comparing these 30 days to the prior.

The Big Ouch

Before looking at my stats I believed my initial outlook was good. I expected more page views per viewer. Unfortunately, this was not the case. I had a big OUCH.

A month ago today I did something that I thought would help my site out by complying more with Google’s SEO suggestions. Google suggest that you do not have more than 100 links on one page. A month ago and a day I averaged about 150 links on my home page. For every post, I had links to their categories and tags. I decided to delete those links, and only display them on the specific post pages. Continue reading »

Sep 092009
 

Check it out my friend… Just about every popular blog has their search box in the top right. Yours is there, right? Mine certainly was. I repeat, was. That above the fold property is just too valuable for me now. I have big plans for it, no not an ad, but featured posts. I’ve wanted a featured post section up there for a long time now, but I felt the search box was far to important to have there. Well, Mr. Search Box, you have finally been demoted. Continue reading »

 

Just playing around last night I decided to overlap 20 popular blogs ranked by fans on Technorati. I wanted to see if there was some hidden consistencies in their layouts. After I overlapped each blog at 10% opacity, I cranked the contrast, and this is the end result.

Headers

I think most of us would expect to find the header on top, and that is where it was prominent when I did the overlap. It was not the case for all blogs though. Many had ads on top, or even content snapshots that pushed the header with logo down as much as 300 pixels. I think mine will stay where it is. Continue reading »

 

Had it ever happened to you that you’re searching something on internet and it took you to many irrelevant sites and at the end you felt you wasted whole of your time. Being an internet user it would have happened to you many times, for sure. Many people may get pissed off on irrelevant search results and don’t trust it. Continue reading »

 

What’s the Most Common Mistake Made?

Before listing off the top ten mistakes I hope you at least understand the most common mistake made. The Improper Use of Header Tags. If you read no further please read this. Heading Tag – A How To. It could substantially improve the usability, design, and SEO of your website.

After doing a ton of my usability and design analyses, I decided to share some of the results with you. The analysis covers thirty-five items total. It covers basic design concepts, known usability techniques, and accessibility issues that can effect your visitors. This list is the top ten items ordered by the worst offenders first. Results are based on the analyses I have done so far in 2009.

1. Improper Use of Header Tags

So the number one mistake I find webmasters making is the improper use of header tags. I can only guess it is the simple fact they do not understand what they are for. Many WYSWYG editors allow you to simply assign a heading with a random heading size, and many webmasters simply select this based on how it looks. I believe they are also influenced by the countless articles implying that by putting your keywords between H2 tags is a good SEO move.

Heading tags indicate the outline of your site. Properly identifying the outline of your site will improve its readability to search engines, and will help clarify content value to the visitor. This is a primary method of establishing a websites structure. About ninety percent of the sites I analyze fail to properly use heading tags!

Here is a simple example on how to use:

<h1>Main Title of Site</h1> – often found in header

<h2>Specific Page Title</h2> – a good reason search engines like h2 tags if done correctly

<h3>Paragraph heading</h3>

<h4>Heading titles to parts of the paragraph</h4>

<h3>Another paragraph heading</h3>

Just think of heading tags as a way to identify an outline.

2. Failing to Validate HTML on W3C

You should validate your site using the rules and standards set by the World Wide Web Consortium, W3C. It helps ensure the widest spectrum of visitors can view your site, and view it they way you expect them to. Too often, extremely embarrassing mistakes have been found on sites because the site owner was unaware how their site appeared on other types of browsers.

There are no said rules that say how you should code a site. As long as it works it works, right? Big mistake. Coding your site with as few errors as possible has many benefits. The simple fact that many web browser developers refer to those standards should be reasoning enough, but if you need more here is a basic one. Validating code makes for an easy error check, even if it is for something as simple as forgetting to close a hyperlink with </a>. Validating code is good for you, the visitor, and search engines trying to figure out your site. More than 90% of the sites I did analyses on failed to validate.

3. Not Having a Search Function

Having a method to search your site is highly recommended when your visitor fails to understand the sites navigation. It can also help find content where normal navigation may be too tedious. The search function should be available from every page, and highly visible. This is additionally becoming an expected function by most web users. You don’t want to disappoint your visitors, do you? Even a simple boolean search will do wonders.

4. Failing to Have a Liquid Layout

Not everyone has the same size monitor. A liquid layout is a site that adjusts automatically to fit any size monitor, and even some PDA devices. The notion of making a site small enough in width to fit older monitors does not work well when viewed on a more modern, larger monitor. Recent studies have found that more than 90% of all web users have monitor property settings set to 1024 in width or greater. This should be an easy fix, and an easy way to keep up with changing technologies.

For those of you that insist on designing 800 pixel wide sites, you can still use percentages and keep that narrow effect. By knowing most people use 1024 settings or greater, simply turn it into a percentage. Don’t say width=800px, say width=78%. This will make a 1024 monitor make your site look 800 pixels wide.

5. Hyperlink Colors Not Changing

Change in hyperlink color after visiting a page is a primary method of navigation for your visitors. Returning visitors can easily track their previous path to a desired destination because they can see where they have been. Over fifty percent of the sites I analyzed fail to recognize this. This should be an easy fix without making your site appearance suffer in any way. You will immediately make your visitors happier with this one. This is a one line CSS fix, “a:visited {color:a_different_color_than_normal_link_color;}”. How hard is that?

6. Linking to the Home Page Poorly

Surprisingly many forget to, or simply do it wrong. Here is the general rule of thumb: Do not include an active link to the homepage on the homepage. This may be over looked if the hyperlink is emphasizing the active link, or if linked by the company logo. Having this link active often generates wasted clicks, and visitors only click so often on average for a particular web site.

After conducting a recent poll, most visitors expect a logo to take you to the home page, even while on the home page.

Additionally, have an easily found link to home page on all other pages. It amazes me on how many people forget to have a link to the home page from other pages! Wow, seems like a no brainer to me.

7. Not Validating CSS

Besides checking for good HTML on a site, I also check to see if their style sheets are valid. The reasoning is the same, and over forty percent of the sites I analyzed failed to validate their CSS. Can you really say your website is done, if you haven’t bothered to check your work yet?

8. Having a Poor Title

On average, search engines grab the first 65 characters of your title. Having a quality title with well-selected keywords will improve your search performance. Also, the title is used when a visitor makes a bookmark, so you should avoid lengthy titles that are not clear from the beginning. Titles reveal what the site is about.

Who knew? I thought the title of a site was where I put the keyword list :0

When giving advice on how to title a web page, I try to get the site owner to visualize their photograph on a book with the title right next to their head. Titles start making sense then, and stop looking so spammy. Here is an article I wrote about titles a while back.

9. Poor Keyword Ranking

When I do an analysis on a site I look at their keywords, and see how they rank. Usually the do not rank in the top thirty. Some common reasons for this is the keywords are too vague, or they are too competitive. Imagine your site is all about money. Would you use a keyword like “Money”? If you did, you are probably wasting your time, and most likely will never rank well with it. Be selective, be extremely niche specific, and pick keywords that people actually may search for. This one is a little easier said than done, but it’s for sure worth the effort to do it right.

10. Fonts Defined by Pixels

Fonts should be sized by relevance, and not by pixels. Use EM or Percentage to specify size. Eyesight begins to degrade for most people over the age of forty, and many adjust font size using their browsers. This is an old favorite of mine, and like the rest of the items I listed above more than forty percent of the websites I analyzed failed to make their fonts adjustable. What amazes me even more is how many sites I found with small text that were clearly made for an older audience. Do not use 8pt on a life insurance or retirement site! I think the only way to sum it up quickly is by saying, know your audience.

Did you know? Firefox users can adjust font size regardless of how a font size has been defined. IE users, sorry. If it’s defined by pixels it stays that size. Web designer using pixels, know that most people still use IE.

That’s It!

That’s it for my top ten website mistakes. All of the items listed above I found occuring over forty percent of the time or greater, so bets are good you can find one or two of them on your own site. I know one of these needs work for this site alone. Your job is never done as a webmaster, though you may think it is.

What did webmasters do well? Two things stuck out, fast loading pages, and a job well done in selecting colors for their sites theme.

 

After reviewing the website Area Rugs Club this morning, I found that they had an very unusual search form. The site has a few different methods to search, and their main one was what got my attention. It was a combination of the method, so I decided to see what the heck was going on.

The Condition

Area Rugs Club sells rugs. In the rug world there are all sorts of criteria. The main ones are: style, color, price, and shape. These are the top ways a visitor will search. So A.R.C. devised three different ways to search. The first is a series of drop downs menus where you can define your ideal rug by the four main methods. The second method was to search by visual clues, by means of icons representing it. See Example of a search for rugs by style: Rugs. The third method is a basic text box search form, so a visitor can search for any product that has the keyword.

The Redundant Search

So here is a screenshot of the unusual search form they have on their home page. It’s a combination of the three search methods they have throughout the site.

form

My first impression was that it was over redundant. Why do you need so many search methods? You don’t need the color icons, it’s in the drop down selection. Why use icons for the brands? Couldn’t they have just put that in a drop down? How about the search box at the bottom? Why not just get rid of all the other options, and just use that? Then I though, it’s a nearly a perfect form.

Why It Works

First thing is first. This rug store needs to have a drop down search by criteria form. Why? Because many other sites have this ability. Online shoppers expect to find a search method like this, and it is a very effective method of finding what you are looking for. Second thing. Those brand name icons sell their site and their product. By having those icons they don’t just help a visitor find what they are looking for, but say “Hey! Look here! We sell the brand you are looking for.” A search form that sells, beat that. Third, colors. Why? For one, it was probably easy to make those icons, and for another reason, it is most likely the second most popular search method. User experiences faster searching by having it. Fourth and last, search by keyword. When all your searching fails, this form will find it, or they don’t have it. End of story, this form is made to work, for the visitor and the seller.

Before you change your search forms to match theirs, make sure you test everything out first. Know how your visitors would prefer to search for your product, do industry research, so you can see how your competitors are doing it, and make sure it is easy to use. I’m guessing every aspect of that form is being put to work, and it is in order of users prefered search method. The users experience was definitely considered in this sites design. Now they just need to get to work on the search form for their blog, Area Rugs Blog. It needs some help, there is no button to click to start the search.