So back in August I went to the San Francisco WordCamp. I learned a lot, and when I got home that day immediately started to make some small changes to my site. Today I was going over my analytics, and though besides my regular number checks, I would see how the numbers reflected after I had made some changes to my blog back in August.

Comparing Previous Averages to Post WordCamp Averages

So I wanted to see if my changes that I made back in August 16th and 17th had any real impact on this site. Here are the numbers comparing the month and a half before August 16th, and after.

Comparing Previous Numbers to Post WordCamp Numbers – Figures indicate = +/- change in percentage
Site Usage Changes from
July 1st to August 16th
Changes from
August 16th to September 30th
Total Visits +16.19% +32.25%
Total Pageviews +22.69% +20.44%
Pages/Visit +5.59% -8.93%
Bounce Rate +0.60% -3.45%
Avg. Time on Site -1.49% +4.62%
Direct Traffic +11.05% +2.64%
Referring Sites +24.25% +72.72%
Search Engines +27.96% -26.93%

Well if you look at total visits my numbers increased by 32% instead of the previous 16%. Initially I will have to say glad I went, and it appeared well worth my time. When I compared total page views and pages per visit, there wasn’t enough substantial change for me to see any effect. My pages a visit changes often, and it could be the difference of just one popular post that gets comment reactions/page views.

The bounce rate went down by almost three and a half percent, and if you are like me, always looking for a way to reduce it by just one percent, I was pleased to see this. I credit this to spending more time writing the articles, and working on my encouragement factor to get visitors to make a comment. Less bouncing also often equals more time spent on the site, and those numbers improved slightly as well.

The last three stats may be misleading, but I wanted to include them. Don’t let the search engine percentage drop fool you. The actual numbers still went up slightly for search engine traffic. The percentage shows as a drop though because of the huge increase in referring site traffic I have been getting. I have been using some of the things I learned about social marketing, and it seems to be working. Look at MyBlogLog Members in the left sidebar. That number was zero a month and half ago.

Loved WordCamp

Anytime your site grows by 32% in just a month and a half be happy. It is substantial, and is a good indicator that you made some positive changes to either your site or marketing. Seeing that bounce rate go down is also a welcomed addition. The fact that I did not spend any money marketing over the past three months also indicates the changes I have made, did indeed benefit my site.

I must say I loved going to WordCamp. I met a few unique individuals like Chuck, the “SEO Rapper”, and learned a lot. One thing I would have like to see though, and I am not sure if it happens at other WordCamps, is to have a few more booths or sponsors. It could help them out in hosting a bigger production, and could give the visitors something to do when they don’t feel like seeing a presentation. Will be going to the next local one when that happens for sure.

 

We’ve all heard Google is King, but is it really? In terms of sending traffic it most certainly is. Who has never used Google, and has been on the Internet before? Anybody? Even Marge Simpson, a cartoon character on T.V., has been seen using it. My question is, “Does Google get more search traffic now because it produces better results, or has it simply just become a trendy method to search?”

I use Google Analytics on many of my sites, so I decided to do a couple of test on three sites that have similar volumes of traffic. Each of them get about 3,000 monthly visitors with much of that traffic coming from search engines. What I was looking for was the behavior a visitor had when they visited my sites. How many pages did they look at? If they looked at a lot of pages, I would imagine my site was close to what they were looking for. So I ran the tests to see what was the average page view per visitor from each search engine. Here are the results.

Two Week Test

My first test was comparing: Google, MSN, Live, and Yahoo. I checked the average number of page views each visitor made from each search engine.

  • Google visitor average page view: 4.76
  • MSN visitor average page view: 4.94
  • Live visitor average page view: 10.20
  • Yahoo visitor average page view: 3.58

Live obviously was the king here, but I decided that two weeks was to short of a period for testing so I ran another test for two months.

Two Month Test

Running the same test, but over a period of two months.

  • Google visitor average page view: 4.90
  • MSN visitor average page view: 6.54
  • Live visitor average page view: 8.54
  • Yahoo visitor average page view: 4.52

Though the results were a little closer Live visitors still out performed the other search engines substantially.

Playing With the Numbers

I also want to make clear of the initial results per site when checking over a two month period. With every site I tested, Live visitors out performed the other search engines. So was the case for MSN, second only to it’s little brother Live. I also want to make clear that the sites tested were of totally different subject matter and industries.

Live is King

So for now, Live is King in my book. I will of course be running more numbers to see how things go. As far as I can tell though, visitors from Live spend more time on the sites I tested compared to other search engines so I can only come to the conclusion that their search results are better. I’ll have to kill off that Google toolbar, and try Lives’s now. Feel free to post some of your own results!