When I do my Basic Usability and Design Analysis, there are two particular items I check for. Does the site stay on topic, and if it has advertisements, do the advertisements interfere with the visitors use of the site.
Here is a good example of staying on topic. The site File-O-Scope does two things really well on this site. They skipped trying to make money from advertisements, and they kept the site on topic. They want to sell LAN file search software and not ad clicks. Ads are distractions, and if you use enough of them, they could start working against you.
The Numbers Against Ads
Imagine the File-O-Scope site with just a couple of Google text ads running. Now imagine it gets 1,000 visitors a day. If ten a day click on those ads, generating say, $0.20 a click, they could make a whopping $2 a day. Over a month that is $60. That $60 also just cost 300 visitors from buying their product. If their marketing guys have been doing a good job, and sending them a quality target audience they should be getting at least 1% of their visitors to make a purchase. 1% of 300 is 3 sales. Their product is $39.95, and that times those three new sales is $119.85. No ads, double their money.
You could argue that you could make more than $0.20 a click, but I could also argue that I did not count the cost to get those visitors to the site. I could also argue that because the site has less distractions without the ads, the sales increased for the group of visitors that did not buy or did not click on an ad. More people were likely to buy. If total sales increased by just 0.5% from overall traffic, that could be five more sales. Revenue from ads on a site like this just don’t add up enough to make sense.
A Signature of Slop
When I see excessive ads on a site, it’s an automatic signature to me that site owner is either desparate, making some serious money, or does not really see the purpose of their own site. Usually it not the case of the first two, but a signature of slop. The sites main idea has been lost, or was never fully developed to begin with. These sites are typically full of distractions, or what I like to think of as “good ideas that don’t belong”, and ads, ads, ads. Why isn’t my site making enough money they think, or I just haven’t sold enough ads. Sorry, that’s not the problem. The problem is their distraction.
Good ideas can also be just as damaging. I have a good idea, I will add another widget to my site. Yikes, don’t do it! Here is a little hint on how to focus your site, and get visitors loving it. The Hint: “One of the greatest inventions for the computer is the delete button.” Don’t go deleting the site though, just the distractions!
Parallel Design Comparison
Tuesday I mentioned that I would be doing a three part post on three different credit cards sites. This is the first of the three. All three card sites are owned by the same person. All three have been designed to give advice to the user about selecting the right card, and offer links to the credit card companies. In this three part post I want to show how testing parallel designs can be beneficial to a site owner, and how being sold on just one layout could be a huge mistake.
The sites in comparison are: http://www.nowcreditcards.co.uk/ (link no longer seems to be working 2/2010), Credit Cards Comparison, and Compare Credit Cards.
Please Comment
Knowing that these sites are designed to educate, and then get visitors to visit the credit card sites, which site do you think performs the best? Specifically, when I say perform, I mean which site do you think sends visitors on to the credit card sites the most? Feel free to comment below saying which one and why. In the third and final part of this post I will reveal the best site, and yes I have spoken to the owner. I do know what site is out performing the others.
Part two of this post will review each site, their selling points, and the steps a user would need to take to complete the desired goal.