The title of this post was partially developed by you! You may be asking at this point, why and how? To answer why, I’m trying to write content that my audience seems to like the most. To answer how, well that is what this post is about.

How Google Analytics Can Reveal Keyword Title Ideas

Using Google Analytics, I decided to look at the top content on this site to get some post ideas. I’ve done this before looking at my Feedburner statistics, and what tags are popular on this site. This method is a little unique though. I wasn’t targeting ideas, I was targeting what keywords within the titles were sparking user interest. Continue reading »

 

Google’s Webmaster Tools Dashboard now comes complete with a keyword significance chart graphing your keywords. They rank the keywords found on your site by count, and in their words should “reflect the subject matter of your site”.

The list displays only one word keyword phrases, and appears to go as low as three characters. It noticed BWI on this site without a problem. I’m just wondering why usability isn’t over design for this site.

The unfortunate part about this new feature is the fact that when you download the list in CSV format, numeric values are not show along with the keywords. It’s just a list of words, but at least they are prioritized order.

Continue reading »

 

I finally killed off the keywords from this site today. It’s time. My problem is, I have been building sites for too long, and it has simply been a hard habit to break. I’m not afraid to use the delete button though, so bye bye! Maybe the page will load a little faster for you now.

When I originally put this site up, I made a hack to create the meta keyword list out of my post tags. Thinking about it now though, it almost seems like search engine spam. I display the keywords in a tag list on the posts page, why do I need to remind bots about them in a keyword list? Was I simply trying to bump the keyword count up? No, I was simply just trying to do it the right way. Continue reading »

Sep 152008
 

Flash is cool, but you still need to be careful how you use it. A classic mistake to make when designing a website is to use images to convey a text message.  Search engines can’t read them, some pda’s won’t display them, and it will most likely create an accessibility problem for those who rely on text version only browsing. Having text in a flash object is basically the same thing for most search engines, and for those of you that have heard that Google can now start reading text in flash, don’t think that it can read all text.

Text in Images is Invisible

Text in an image is invisible to search engines, and when that image is in flash it’s just as invisible. Using  this Austin Real Estate site, you can see a great example of flash failing the owner, the search engines, and the users. Looking at their screen shot below you can see the flash they used in the header.

withflash

I don’t know about you, but if this was my real estate site, I would definitely want those keywords visible to search engines. Search engines can’t read them. How do I know? Well for one, Google is the only search engine currently claiming they can read flash sites. So that means unless it’s Google, it can’t read it. The second more important reason, is actually seeing that Google did not read it. Here is a link to text version Google has cached of the site. Notice the text Google indexes for the site starts at the menu below the header flash. Text in this flash? It’s invisible.

Google Can Read Flash

If Google can read text in flash, why can’t it read this sites text? It can’t read the text in this flash because, really, there is none. It’s just an animated image that has some text on it. There is no menu, text content, or links for Google to do anything with. When Google finds text in flash, it’s reading things like the flash menu, or links within the menu, not the pictures. What failed this sites SEO? Images conveying a text message!